Cavity care isn’t one-size-fits-all anymore. With minimally invasive options like silver diamine fluoride (SDF), preventative tools like sealants, and restorative staples like fillings, dental professionals now have a broader toolkit to treat decay effectively. But knowing when to reach for each option is critical to optimizing outcomes, minimizing trauma, and meeting patient expectations—especially for children or those with special considerations.
Let’s break down the differences between SDF, sealants, and fillings so your team can confidently recommend the right approach every time.
What each treatment is designed to do
Dental sealants
Dental fillings
| Treatment | Pros | Cons |
| Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) | Non-invasive Low cost Fast application Excellent for caries control in primary teeth |
Stains carious tissue black Requires recall for reapplication Not suitable for deep lesions |
| Dental sealants | Non-invasive Preventive rather than reactive Quick to apply |
Only effective on sound surfaces Prone to loss over time Technique-sensitive |
| Dental fillings | Definitive treatment Restores function and esthetics Long-lasting when done properly |
Requires drilling May provoke anxiety Higher cost and time commitment |
SDF: Use when the lesion is small to moderate in size, the patient is pre-cooperative or has special healthcare needs, or you're managing high caries risk with limited tolerance for traditional care.
Choosing between SDF, sealants, and fillings isn’t about selecting a “better” option—it’s about applying the right solution for the right patient at the right time. Consider lesion severity, cooperation level, cosmetic concerns, and long-term outcomes when planning care.
At Frontier Dental, we’re here to support your clinical decisions with trusted tools for caries prevention and restoration. Whether you’re reaching for a sealant, SDF, or composite, we’ve got you covered.
Explore our full line of caries management solutions:https://frontierdental.com/us/en/categories