Cavity care isn’t one-size-fits-all anymore. With minimally invasive options like silver diamine fluoride (SDF), preventative tools like sealants, and restorative staples like fillings, dental professionals now have a broader toolkit to treat decay effectively. But knowing when to reach for each option is critical to optimizing outcomes, minimizing trauma, and meeting patient expectations—especially for children or those with special considerations.
Let’s break down the differences between SDF, sealants, and fillings so your team can confidently recommend the right approach every time.
What each treatment is designed to do
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
- A liquid solution used to arrest active caries non-invasively
- Ideal for patients who are very young, medically compromised, or dental-phobic
- Requires no anesthesia or drilling
- Effective for controlling caries progression, especially in primary teeth
Dental sealants
- A flowable resin applied to pits and fissures of molars and premolars
- Designed for caries prevention—not treatment
- Common in pediatric and adolescent populations
- Often covered by insurance under preventive codes
Dental fillings
- A restorative approach that removes carious tissue and restores tooth structure with composite or amalgam
- Necessary when decay has caused structural compromise
- Requires drilling and local anesthetic in most cases
- Can be esthetic and long-lasting when well-maintained
Pros and cons: clinical and practical considerations
| Treatment | Pros | Cons |
| Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) | Non-invasive Low cost Fast application Excellent for caries control in primary teeth |
Stains carious tissue black Requires recall for reapplication Not suitable for deep lesions |
| Dental sealants | Non-invasive Preventive rather than reactive Quick to apply |
Only effective on sound surfaces Prone to loss over time Technique-sensitive |
| Dental fillings | Definitive treatment Restores function and esthetics Long-lasting when done properly |
Requires drilling May provoke anxiety Higher cost and time commitment |
When to use each option: clinical scenarios
SDF: Use when the lesion is small to moderate in size, the patient is pre-cooperative or has special healthcare needs, or you're managing high caries risk with limited tolerance for traditional care.
Sealants: Apply on newly erupted molars and premolars in children with moderate to high caries risk. They’re most effective when placed before caries occurs.
Fillings: Opt for restorations when decay has reached dentin, is causing symptoms, or has undermined enamel. Also, appropriate when aesthetics or function are compromised.
Patient communication tips
Helping patients or parents understand these treatment options builds trust and improves case acceptance:
Be honest: Explain SDF staining upfront to manage cosmetic expectations.
Be preventive: Position sealants as a proactive investment.
Be thorough: Walk through longevity, follow-ups, and costs for each option.
Conclusion: Match the method to the mouth
Choosing between SDF, sealants, and fillings isn’t about selecting a “better” option—it’s about applying the right solution for the right patient at the right time. Consider lesion severity, cooperation level, cosmetic concerns, and long-term outcomes when planning care.
At Frontier Dental, we’re here to support your clinical decisions with trusted tools for caries prevention and restoration. Whether you’re reaching for a sealant, SDF, or composite, we’ve got you covered.
Explore our full line of caries management solutions:https://frontierdental.com/us/en/categories
